
Are you wondering why automated financial workflows are no longer optional for growing businesses? If yes, the answer rests here.
According to Flair,50%of work today is automable. Over the years, 36 million small businesses operating in the United States have utilised automation to grow their business as well.
Thus, this article intends to study automation as a tool for growth in businesses, understand the real cost of manual financial processes, and more!
Key Takeaways
- The real cost of manual financial processes
- How to determine if a business has outgrown its financial processes
- What manual workflows are at risk
- Priorities in automation
- How does it align with your growth
- What good financial workflows look like
- Five questions to ask before opting for a workflow tool
Manual workflows can conveniently hide the true cost. And because it goes unnoticed, it becomes even more painful.
But the numbers are significant. Industry benchmarks across thousands of AP departments show that businesses without automation spend an average of $12.88 to process a single invoice, compared to under $3 for organizations using best-in-class automated workflows.
For a business handling a few hundred invoices a month, that gap translates to tens of thousands of dollars a year.
If we just consider the indirect costs alone, before factoring in late payment penalties, missed early-payment discounts, or the time your finance team spends on work, all can be easily automated.
And this problem compounds with growth. With a rise in transactions, the pressure multiplies as well.
Fun Fact RPA can execute routine tasks 20 times fasterthan humans.
The main and foremost problem is realising that the business workflow has a problem.
A missed payment, a duplicate invoice that slips through, or an audit that takes twice as long as it should all depict the visible problems.
Some of the warning signs include:
If two or moreof suc problem appears, it could be a clear signal. The process that got you here isn’t the one that will get you to the next stage.
When approval processes are informal, the conditions for errors and fraud both increase.
Organizations lose an estimated 5% of revenue to fraud each year, with a median loss of $145,000 per incident, and the primary cause appears to be a lack of internal controls.
For small and mid-sized businesses already operating on tight margins, those numbers hit hard.
75% of small firms cite rising costs as their top financial challenge, with over half reporting difficulty paying operating expenses.
Such circumstances make it difficult for companies to stand and pose great risks in their growth and output.
One of the biggest misconceptions about workflow automation is that it’s all or nothing.
In reality, the smartest approach is to start where the volume is highest and where errors would cost you the most, then build from there.
Here’s a practical order of priority for most growing businesses.
You don’t need to automate everything on day one. Starting with end-to-end accounts payable automation and building outward from there gives you the highest return for the least disruption.
The urgency here scales with the business. A company adding headcount, onboarding new vendors, or expanding into new markets will see its financial transaction volume increase well before its finance team has the capacity to keep up.
This is especially true for SaaS and subscription-heavy businesses, where recurring spend commitments can stack up fast, and getting the right controls around spend early is far easier than trying to retrofit them once the gaps have already caused problems.
Automation means taking the informal rules that already exist in your business, who should approve what, and at what dollar amount, and building them into structured workflows that run consistently without manual intervention.
In practice, that looks like this:
None of this requires months of implementation or a dedicated IT team. For most businesses, the setup takes days, not quarters.
If you’re evaluating tools to automate your financial workflows, these are the questions that will help you separate solutions:
The right tool should fit into how your business already operates and scale with you as things get more complicated.
If your business is growing but your financial workflows haven’t changed since you had five employees, the gap between those two things is costing you more than you think.
And closing that gap, starting with the highest-volume workflows and building from there, is one of the most practical improvements a growing business can make right now.
This is basically a framework that businesses adopt to handle money-related tasks.
The two different types of automated workflows are: Business process and robotic process.
The best type of workflow is a sequential workflow.
The key benefit is greater operational efficiency.